« Is Russia a Conservative Country? | Main | At the Crossroads of Strategic Pipeline Corridors:
Settling the Dispute Over Nagorno-Karabakh »


April 1, 2009
The Myth of the Yellow Peril:
Overhyping Chinese Migration into Russia

by Anatoly Karlin

title1.jpg

One of the staples of alarmist, pessimistic and/or Russophobic (not to mention Sinophobic) commentary on Russian demography is a reworking of the yellow peril thesis. In these fevered imaginations, Chinese supposedly swim across the Amur River in their millions, establishing village communes in the taiga, and breeding prolifically so as to displace ethnic Russians and revert Khabarovsk and Vladivostok back to their rightful Qing Dynasty-era names, Boli and Haisanwei.

To a limited extent they have a point. Since 1989 the population of the Russian Far East declined by 14% to 6.7 million in 2002; shorn of subsidies from the center, it is now dependent on the rest of East Asia for food and consumer imports. It sits next to Chinese Manchuria (the provinces of Heilongjiang, Liaoning and Jilin), an environmentally-strained rust belt of 108 million souls. Thus it is not surprising to see American geopolitical jockeys, Russian xenophobes and anti-Putin "liberals" alike (i.e. Radio Free Europe's Aleksandr Golts and Echo Moskvi Radio's Yulia Latynina, etc) claiming that a stealth demographic invasion of Russia is well underway which will in a few years result in a Chinese Far East.

What Are the Facts About Chinese Migration into Russia?

However, I prefer facts and statistics to rhetoric and hyperbole and fortunately an excellent Russian demographic publication had this subject as its main theme in its October 2008 issue - Life in Russia Through Chinese Eyes. I will translate its main findings and conclusions to an English- speaking audience and then muse on the implications for future geopolitics.

The issue of Chinese migration to Russia and its political consequences starts with one main question - how many of them are there? All reputable estimates are in the range of 200,000 to 400,000, with 500.000 as the absolute maximum, most of them shuttle traders or seasonal laborers. The academic Gel'bras first came with these figures in 2001, based on adding up numbers from separate towns and regions. Foreign policy heavyweight and government official Sergei Prikhodko estimated a range of 150,000 to 200,000. According to the Federal Migration Service, in 2006 a total of 202,000 Chinese got registered as temporary workers in Russia, or 20% of all Gastarbeiters; although their numbers increased to 331,000 in 2007, they made up only 17% of all immigrant labor.

A Stealth Chinese Invasion?

The alarmists believe that there is a massive, stealthy infiltration of Chinese into the deserted Far Eastern forests, where they establish communes and breed for the future glory of Greater China. Writing in the respectable "Russian Federation Today" in 2004, the academic Gil'bo spoke of 8 million Chinese living in Russia today and predicted its increase to 21 million in 2010 and a staggering 44 million by 2020. The article was called "Perspectives on the Sinoization of Russia" - although that may have been his perspective, to date no-one has confirmed it. No secret Chinese communes have been discovered in the Far East. Although it is true that the figure of 35,000 ethnic Chinese given in the 2002 Census is too low by an order of magnitude, the millions plus numbers are equally unrealistic. It is nigh impossible to be self-sufficient in food in the Far East and the idea that so many people will be both willing to endure medieval-like hardships and remain permanently hidden for years belongs to the the realm of fantasy.

Who Are the Chinese Coming to Russia and Where Do They Come From?

Let us now look at the portrait of a typical Chinese migrant. Demoscope organized a poll of 700 traders and workers and 200 students, half of them in Moscow and one sixth each in the cities of Khabarovsk, Blagoveschensk and Vladivostok. Of those, 60% were men; most were middle-aged; and a surprisingly high 21% had a higher education (even in recent times tertiary enrollment in China stood at 12% of the young population). Below is a table of where they came from.

Russia Moscow Far East В том числе
Vladivostok Khabarovsk Blagoveschensk
Beijing 6 10 2 2 3 0
Heilongjiang 45 11 79 66 86 85
Liaoning 7 11 3 4 3 2
Jilin 8 8 9 14 5 9
Hebei 1 1 1 2 0 1
Shandong 2 1 3 6 0 2
Shanghai 2 3 1 1 1 0
Fujian 3 7 0 0 1 0
Zhejiang 5 9 0 1 0 0
Jiangsu 5 9 1 2 0 0
Guangdong 3 5 0 0 1 0
Other 13 25 2 3 0 3
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100

The vast majority in the Far East hail from the neighboring province of Heilongjiang while most of the rest come from nearby Jilin and Liaoning - this illustrates the cross-the-border-and-back nature of the migratory flows there. In Moscow, whose Chinese population is much smaller, there is a much more even distribution of Chinese by region of origin, with substantial numbers coming from the eastern and southern seaboards.

Migrants from China's Great Northwest Rust Belt

Most migrants come from cities or small towns, and only 20% from villages - although the latter figure is higher in Moscow. Only 5% were employed in agriculture back in China. 38% were "workers" and 11% were "worker-peasants". Although only 6% admitted they had been unemployed, the real figure is much higher since 70% of workers and 68% of worker peasants said they migrated because they couldn't find a job in China. This is not surprising. The Chinese northeast is a depressed rust belt whose state-owned factories fired many of their workers years ago, many of whom were classified as "awaiting job" - a nice way of saying unemployed, and nice for official Chinese statistics too. Another 11% of Chinese migrants were government workers, presumably wanting to make some more money on the side. A surprising 35% considered their material situation in China to be "good" or "very good"; 36% evaluated it as "medium", and 29% believed it to be "bad" or "very bad".

howlonglived.jpg

According to the above graph, most Chinese immigrants are relative newcomers to Russia. In the critical Far East region, only 23% have spent more than five years in the country.

How Chinese Workers Live in Russia

Few Chinese have affluent lifestyles in Russia - the majority, 61%, view their material condition as "medium" or "satisfactory", 15% as "bad" or "very bad" and 21% are "good" or "very good". Their earnings are not particularly high, with 83% getting less than 20,000 rubles - roughly the same as in neighboring Heilongjiang, when they had jobs there. Many say they save up on accommodation, medicines and even food in Russia. Leisure activities are plain and inexpensive - TV/Internet (23%), Chinese friends (17%) and family (12%). 22% have no free time. Only a quarter does touristy things, spends time with Russian friends, or do shopping or sport.

Most migrants come with the help of those already based there, who give them a hands up. The Chinese communities in Russia are tightly-knight, insular and highly trust-based, albeit fragmented into regional and ethnic groupings. According to the poll, 4% say they are directors or owners of an enterprise, 15% work for a Chinese firm, 9% work for a Russian firm and 53% are "independent entrepreneurs" - however, in practice the majority of the latter are hired workers and traders in informal relations with a Chinese company. Relations with employers are generally harmonious, with 25% saying they enjoy good relations, 41% evaluating them as "satisfactory" and only 1% complaining that they're bad. The other 31% don't work for hire.

They typically learn enough Russian to get by, but no more. Only 9% have a good knowledge of the language and another 5% can read; 33% can explain themselves and 43% are bad at the language. Another 6% are currently studying the language at an institute. Only 4% don't know any Russian. Life is adaptive rather than planned - only 15% acquaint themselves with Russian laws or regulations. This is presumably because doing so makes little difference, with 82% of Chinese experiencing police requisitions, 49% rackets and 45% bribery amongst tax and customs officials.

What Do Chinese Living in Russia Want?

Given the above, it is somewhat surprising to see that a majority of Chinese think that conditions for small and medium businesses are good in Russia. I guess all things are relative.

businessconditions.jpg

The Chinese have mixed opinions of how they're viewed in Russia. In the Far East, attitudes towards them are more favorable than in Moscow. Locals are relatively friendlier in the Far East and Muscovites are more hostile. In the Far East, 25% claimed they had things stolen from them, 9% were beaten, 22% were threatened and 53% were insulted; in Moscow 16% said they were beaten.

chineseviewed.jpg

That said, most Chinese migrants retained a favorable view of Russia and many expressed the desire to continue living there. Impressions generally improved after visiting it and the outcome of most trips were classed as "successful" or "partly successful".

russia_impressions.jpg

Most prefer to remain in Russia and open a business or expand it (Far East), get accommodation (Moscow) and improve one's life in Russia. It appears the Chinese place far more emphasis on Russia's potential to make them money than minor things like whether they get ripped off by militsiya or customs officials or get beaten by skinheads. A majority would prefer to either live in Russia permanently or live in China and keep commuting to Russia for work, even amongst those with negative impressions of the country. There are big regional differences. 67% of Moscow Chinese would like to get some form of permanent residency in Russia, compared to 27% in the Far East - despite the fact that attitudes towards them are significantly better in the Far East. The majority would like to bring a family member to Russia, especially those in Moscow.

liveinrussia.jpg

59% of Chinese migrants would like their children to retain connections to Russia - 76% in Moscow and 37% in the Far East. Some 85% in Moscow and half in the Far East are not against mixed marriage - 2% are currently in such a marriage. For comparison, 8% of Russians approve of mixed marriages, 40% are neutral and 40% disapprove.

Moscow Versus the Regions

In conclusion, more Chinese migrants in the Far East think that Russia has better conditions for enterprise and consider locals to have better attitudes towards them, than their compatriots in Moscow. However, Moscow's much smaller and diverse pool of Chinese migrants is much more enthusiastic about integrating themselves and their children and relatives into Russia. Thus what we see is a developing China-town in Moscow and moderate, temporary and mostly seasonal flows of Chinese into and out of the Far East who view Russia in an almost purely commercial light - a way to escape unemployment, make profits and enjoy them in China. The writers end the report by making the obvious (and banal) recommendation that Russia should both regulate migration in accordance with the national interest and treat migrants with respect - both much easier said than done.

Some more articles that serve to counteract the hysteria about Chinese migration:

Chinese Migration - Facts, Objectivity and Subjectivity: a Kazakh perspective. As in Russia, they massively overstate the Chinese presence, mixed marriages, etc. Ironically twice as many Kazakhs visit China every year than vice versa.

What's happening with Chinese expansion in Russia?: a comprehensive and sarcastic recounting of prior alarmist estimates of the numbers of Chinese in Russia.

The Russian vector in global Chinese migration: notes that the alarmism of the 1990's and early 2000's is dwindling away and being replaced by more scientific views of Chinese migration to Russia. Notes that Russian migration as a share of total Chinese global migration is tiny - as of 1990, the total number of Chinese overseas was about 37mn, including 30% of the population in Malaysia, 10% in Thailand, 17% in Brunei and 4% in Indonesia. Lots of other stuff.

Worst Case Scenarios?

I will now go beyond demography into geopolitics. China is not the monolith that it is usually painted as in the West; its strong central government conceals a greater deal of simmer, dynamism and regionalism. The idea that it could organize a successful stealth demographic invasion of the Far East is preposterous. The only way in which something like this could succeed would be if Russia were to collapse again and to a far greater extent than during the 1990's, e.g. like during the Civil War when Vladivostok was occupied by the Japanese. This is possible, but highly unlikely.

What you have instead is a reversion to Nineteenth-century traditions, in which Korean and Chinese laborers and traders made seasonal migrations to the Far East and built up sizable, but far from demographically dominant, communities in the region (who were later deported to Central Asia in 1937 over fears of Japanese espionage).

Why a Russo-Chinese War Is Extremely Unlikely

Speaking of which, that would be a real concern if China were to ever invade. That said, Chinese expansion has always been primarily aimed at South East Asia - today's strategic posture and Chinese military planning in general emphasizes a limited, hi-tech war against the likes of Taiwan, Japan the U.S. Historically China aimed to achieve three geopolitical aims in the following order:

1) Maintain central authority over the commercial seaboard and the peasant hinterland

2) Surround itself by a buffer of vassal states on land - Tibet, Sinkiang, Mongolia, Manchuria, etc.

3) Build a strong navy to repel sea-based foreign predation, protect its trade and extend its influence over East Asia. Now and in the future, China is going to have cope with a panoply of threats to those geopolitical goals - rising inequalities, a disconnected bureaucracy, ethnic separatism and American and Japanese sea power. In other words, it's going to have its hands full and Chinese willingness to pursue reconciliation and friendship with Russia is a reflection of its need for a safe strategic rear (see Sino-Russian Relations in China Debates the Future Security Environment, Michael Pillsbury).

China's Internal Problems

China is going to run into severe ecological problems within the next few decades. Water tables are plummeting in the country's northern breadbasket, crop yields are stagnating and the deserts are spreading. The south has plenty of water but is threatened by inundation due to the melting of the icecaps. The rivers that feed its people and industry are going to run dry as the Himalayan glaciers melt away. This means that as soon as the 2030's, overpopulated China will be faced with a scenario in which it will either have to acquire new lands or face a sustenance crisis, perhaps culminating in a die-off typical of past cycles. Would it invade the Russian Far East?

Why is Russia's Far East Worth Conquering?

The problem with this is that even if it were to succeed in conquering it, actually building up the infrastructure for human accommodation will take decades; the land is barren, mountainous and will remain very cold even after significant global warming. The actual war will be very costly for the Chinese because the Russians will almost certainly use their huge stockpile of tactical nuclear weapons to check the assault. Should the Russians lose, it's possible they will unleash their much superior strategic nuclear arsenal or even worse weapons on China - thus destroying their industrial infrastructure and precipitating a massive die-off.

Hence I believe that if, or more likely when, ecological problems reach a critical point in China they will expand into (by then collapsed) East Africa, using the mighty navy they foresightedly built up to forestall anyone who has a problem with that. It will also guarantee continued energy, food and resource flows into metropolitan China from Australia and Latin America. Eventually it is possible that Russia (and Canada) will fully open up their borders to immigration from the sinking and drying south, in which case the Far East will become Chinese. But this is all futuristic speculation.

An Agenda Behind Doom and Gloom Over Russian Demographics?

The essence of Russian demographic doomerism is that in a few decades the AIDS-ravaged, infertile and alcoholic ethnic Russian component will die out and be replaced by hordes of Islamist fanatics in the West and Chinese in the East.


Anatoly Karlin is a San Francisco based independent writer, political analyst and media critic. He is the author of the blog Sublime Oblivion focusing on the Russian economy, demography, and future global trends. This article originally appeared here.



TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/17641

12 Comments

Russia Blog's ongoing promotion of Russophile drivel.

What a match between the Russian racist imperialists and the Chinese.

Yo Karlin!

I don't like your attitude.

Yulia Latynina is a sexy Russian patriot, who cares about her country and the rest of the world. I have asked http://www.fathead.com to make a blowup doll of her.

Alexander Golts and Pavel Felgenhauer are two great military minds.

Many Russians don't agree with me because they're Mongoloid. The Russians played patsy to the Mongols long ago.

This explains why Russia didn't have democratic revolutions like in Georgia and Ukraine. In Russia, great people like Soros and Khodorkovsky get killed, beaten or jailed.

Russia would benefit from a foreign Western occupation. Cowardly Western politicians should've let Patton go all the way to Russia.

Excellent article, Anatoly--Thank you for communicating these very important issues, and I appreciate your perspective throughout.

I think one particularly important point you made was, "China is not the monolith that it is usually painted as in the West; its strong central government conceals a greater deal of simmer, dynamism and regionalism." This is actually quite a common scenario, and is known in the social psychological literature as the 'outgroup homogeneity effect'. Because we have less interaction with members of groups we don't belong to, we have less opportunity and motivation to learn of differences within those groups. Therefore, they tend to seem more unified (and homogeneous).

So...it is not so surprising to see such misperceptions here as well...

@La Loserdope

I think your thinking of the British imperialists who or there support and financing of Marxist terrorists like Lenin and Trotsky who later gainerd control of Russia murdering the royal family denied exile in Britain by his dear uncle.

Or the British control of China under the British empire who launch the opium wars amongst other things and let Japan occupy it in WW2 and today supports sepratism and terrorism in Tibet and Xinjing.

An Agenda Behind Doom and Gloom Over Russian Demographics

This is a fact that the US, EU and middle Eastern proxy governments and there intelligence agencies are training, supporting and financing terrorist groups in Russia and Central Asia clearly defined in Brezinski's 97 book the Grand Chessboard and his Arc of Crisis region that he layed out.

I hope Russia blog in a future article reviews Brezinski's Grand Chessboard and the events since it's publication.

La Loserdope : "Cowardly
Western politicians should've let Patton go all the way to Russia."

"La Loserdope", Russia would have destroyed the US.

With the help of Lend-Lease materiel of course.

Keep in mind it was Russia that beat Hitler.

WWII was about Germany and Russia.

Everything else was a sideshow.

Here's some stats to bring the point home:

Germany lost ~88% of her men fighting against the Russians.

Germany used ~85% of her military resources fighting against the Russians.

The turning point in the war as at Stalingrad, before the US entered the European war.

@La Loserdope

I see your being sarcastic I get it now.

CIA media front Radio Free Europe and Jewish mafia created Guisinky Echo Moskvi.

“This explains why Russia didn't have democratic revolutions like in Georgia and Ukraine. In Russia, great people like Soros and Khodorkovsky get killed, beaten or jailed.”

Soros/CIA created states backed by two fascist losers who tried to deflect attention from themselves by waging war against Russia and blitzing South Ossetia.
Ukrainian goons threatening Austrian doctor who examined and told the truth about the dioxin farce and the Georgian president who beats up opposition protestors

Soros former Nazi collaborator a Rothschild agent run alternative media against the Serbs, involved in the international drug trade, supporting Islamic terrorism against Serbs and Russians
Khoderkovsky Rothschild front man in who got his fortune through blackmail, theft and murder.

"Many Russians don't agree with me because they're Mongoloid. The Russians played patsy to the Mongols long ago."

Well that’s typical Racism the kind that made you support the Communist invasion and genocide against the Russians your supremacist Bolshevik/Nazi goon.

Rassia is an Assian nation.

@Brian,

Thanks for the compliments. What you talk about, in the Western context, is "orientalism", the culture of essentialising civilizations east of Visegrad. Applied to China, it makes the concept of a demographic invasion an object of serious discussion, whereas in reality that is patently not the case.

@La Loserdope,

I was wondering, is it La Russophobe? Or a fine prankster? ;)

@Elmer,

I think Russia is a Eurasian nation.

The Russia Blog is speaking closer to the BBC and CNN more and more. where were the Russian white people back to 200 years ago? In the Europe. the old Russians Migration into the far-east with a number of bloodbaths. just like the American British did to the Indians in America. So you really should stop telling the junks to the readers. Dont be the next BBC or CNN.

I'd love to hear what is Moscow's position on the Chinese migration in the far east. As far as I am aware certain cities are reaching 100% chinese population. Even if the chinese do not put their claim on the land once all russians die out, what is the difference, the chinese will be enjoying resources rich region and will go virtually ungoverned and they will certainly not look after russia's interests. I fear Russia is looking at being reduced to the size of poland and having similar reserves of natural resouces.

@Cheburashka
Did you not read any of the above post?

Yes I did and there is nothing constructive.

Leave a comment

Dotted Divider Line



Russia Blog presents up-to-date news, facts and commentary on the state of events in Russia and the former Soviet Union. The blog was created and is managed by Yuri Mamchur, Director of Discovery Institute's Real Russia Project, Executive Director of the World Russia Forum, and a Vanderbilt University MBA graduate.


 






Send an email to us at:
yuri@discovery.org
charles@discovery.org