
By Alicia Hoffer
Alexander Sukarov’s beautiful film The Russian Ark provides an encouraging counterpoint to the recent deluge of disheartening news pouring out of Russia. When a Russian film director and a French aristocrat find themselves lost in the enormous Winter Palace in St. Petersburg, the viewer begins a journey through the annals of Russian history. By the end of that journey, the Russian and the Westerner have witnessed the unfolding drama of Russia’s centuries-old dance with Europe and the viewer has been caught up in the intriguing question of Russian identity.
This film has won numerous accolades for its grandiose cinematography. Sukarov attempted the impossible - and succeeded - when he captured all 96 minutes of The Russian Ark in one shot. With some 2,000 actors and extras, three live orchestras, and a flowing dialogue, this was a Herculean task. The shoot was made even more difficult by the restrictions imposed to permit use of the historic, high-profile set. The State Hermitage Museum, Saint Petersburg’s repository of fine art from around the world, is one of Russia’s most popular tourist attractions. The museum could only afford to turn its staterooms, corridors, and ballrooms over to Sukarov for just one precious day.
Sukarov made the most of his single day. After months of careful planning and delicate rehearsal, the movie was captured on the third attempt. In the end, Sukarov created a masterpiece breath-taking in size and scope. The film enchants viewers with its lavish balls, graceful princesses, stately tsars and magnificent backdrop. Priceless paintings and sculptures heighten the aesthetic appeal of the story.

While the artistry of the film gains immediate recognition, the graceful story of The Russian Ark is more subtle than the backdrop. After the unnamed Russian director wakes from a mysterious accident, he finds himself in the midst of a group of 18th Century ladies and officers, searching for a party inside. The director, apparently invisible to the group, follows after the lively bunch and ends up in the winding basement halls of Peter the Great’s Winter Palace. Our unseen cameraman shortly comes upon a figure who acknowledges his presence: a French Marquis. The Marquis becomes his companion and guide, as the two set upon their meandering journey.

One film critic, Henry Sheehan, described the journey perfectly. “Russian Ark doesn’t act so much as it muses: on art, on history, on Russia versus the West, on politics.” Musing together on these wide-ranging subjects the Marquis and the director seldom reach conclusions. The Marquis, quick to point out European excellence, continually stresses the debt Russia owes to the West. The Rafael room, he emphasizes, was copied from the Vatican. A skilled orchestra, he observes, must be Italian. The director sometimes replies and argues, but often he simply turns his camera and glides away to yet another scene of Russian beauty and character. He captures the personality of Catherine the Great, the will of Peter the Great, the statecraft of Nicholas I, and the delicate Russian beauty of the last Romanov daughters. He also reveals some painful moments of Russia’s past. At one point, the Marquis carelessly opens the door to the World War II siege of Leningrad. The Marquis and director glimpse a world suddenly gray and harsh and they meet a worker speaking of death and destruction. The Marquis doesn’t want to hear the tale of Nazi Germany’s 900-day siege; he doesn’t want to know about over a million Russian deaths in the starved city. He wants to carry on to the final ball.

Tilman Buttner - the man behind the camera
Some have asked about the relevance of The Russian Ark. If it were not filmed in one shot, would we really take notice of such a meandering and inconclusive film? But I argue that this film wanders, in 96 minutes, through a reverie of Russian history and thinking that remains poignant today. The juxtaposition of the siege of Leningrad and the grand balls of the tsars, the tragic and the superfluous in the same palace, is a message for Russia today. Russia is a land of contradictions. As President Putin recently told world leaders at the G-8 summit, Russia is still carving her own path in this world. The journey might not make sense to the European Marquis who keeps searching for the West in Russia, but Russia is simply continuing her historic dance between tragedy and beauty.

Alicia Hoffer is a student at Seattle Pacific University and a summer intern with Discovery Institute.



Comments
I guess the point of this "review" is that the film is coming out on DVD or something, since it was actually released in 2002. Whatever the reason, it seems to tell quite a one-sided story about the film. Though it purports to be "review" I don't see much criticism at all, just glowing praise, nor much in the way of information that is new. Actually, it seems pretty much like a commercial.
To my mind, this film is a classic example of Russians taking something that could be useful in burnishing Russia's image and making it totally inaccessible to most moviegoers (not unlike Nikita Mikhailkov woeful failure "The Barber of Siberia"). The meager boxoffice receipts for the film, and its narrow release in theaters, neither mentioned in this review, clearly show it was a complete failure in bringing Russian culture to a wide audience.
And I think the information about its critical appreciation is somewhat overwrought. The film didn't even make the year's top 20 based on a compendium of critical reviews for the year. http://www.oscarrace.com/crit02.htm (the Spanish language film Y Tu Mama Tambien came in second).
The film wasn't even nominated for best foreign language film at the 2003 Oscars (a German film won). http://www.oscars.org/75academyawards/nomswins.html
Posted by: Lenard | August 6, 2006 8:56 AM
I loved the movie but found it to be a mystery, (a riddle really)wrapped in an enigma.
Posted by: White Buffalo Woman | August 6, 2006 10:56 AM
Awesome review. I'll have to check it out.
Posted by: Andrew Waller | August 8, 2006 2:06 PM
:)))
Posted by: Felix | August 9, 2006 5:47 AM
I was there in Saint Petersburg at the Hermitage during the film shot during Russian Ark event. Best movie ever made, no US $20 million actor could of acted in such a film like this. This is real film making and real actoring without expensive salaries to perform. You want to see a good movie, this is real Russian work, everything is all Russian and real Russian talent. Worth ever penny spent, will see it again and again.
Alexander Sokurov should of received an Academy Award for best foreign international film for 2003. In my eyes this is the best movie ever made.
Scott Marcott
Posted by: Scott Marcott | April 24, 2007 12:59 AM
Esta es una de las mejores peliculas que e visto; se las recomiendo a todos, los actores son fenomenales!
Posted by: Abel de la Horga | July 1, 2008 4:16 AM